adstringendummod: (Default)
Adstringéndum Mods ([personal profile] adstringendummod) wrote2009-09-13 11:23 pm

Community-Wide Player HMD

HMD POST

This post is an opt-in, player-based HMD.

HMD - "How's My Driving"
Opened post for criticism about how a character is played in a roleplay community. (UrbanDictionary.com)

For the purposes of this post: Critique must, above all else, be useful to the player it is directed towards. Please provide helpful advice or suggestions, and avoid inflammatory/derogatory comments, spam, silliness, or excess praise. This is meant to aid players.
- This is not a love meme. There can be love, but only paired with concrit.
- Flames will not be tolerated and will be deleted as they are useless to players.
- IP tracking will be on to prevent abuse, especially of the above two issues.


If you'd like to participate: Comment to this post listing the characters you play and want critique on. We will unscreen each of those comments.

Then everyone is free to reply (anonymously or signed in) with critique to various players' posts, and (as the critique-giver), feel free to mark in the subject header if you want your critique to stay screened or be unscreened. The original player will be able to see comments regardless of if they are screened or not, though no one else will see screened comments, and screened comments cannot be replied to without unscreening first.

Anon enabled.  IP logging on.  Screened default.
al_truism: (Default)

Screened or unscreened, doesn't matter.

[personal profile] al_truism 2009-09-14 06:31 am (UTC)(link)
Alphonse Elric
Inugami Kotarou
Chaera

Any and all feedback is welcome. Examples and specifics always help, especially with Al. Even if it's just a nitpick about my spelling or speech patterns, or just a minor issue that made you say "they wouldn't do that!" or "I can't put my finger on it, but they didn't handle that quite right" please, please point it out.
Edited 2009-09-14 06:33 (UTC)

[identity profile] adstrngndummod.livejournal.com 2009-09-14 06:38 am (UTC)(link)
We actually meant the "screened or unscreened" thing to apply to the wishes of the crit-giver, as some of them may want their crit to remain unseen by anyone but the receiver.

Sorry. I knew when I wrote it that it was a little badly worded there, but I couldn't structure it any differently at the time.